The dpp has mixed evaluations of ecfa's operation before and after taking office, and lacks consistent policy propositions Tsai ing-wen once pointed out that the operation of ecfa will "Deepen the gap between rich and poor and urban and rural areas, small and medium-sized enterprises and traditional industries will be forced to close their factories, and taiwanese people will leave their hometowns and go to china to find job opportunities." the dpp once led the anti-ecfa demonstrations of "Anti-one china market, people's referendum as the master", and advocated the ecfa referendum's "Millions of co-signers to save taiwan"; labelled as "Excessive reliance on china" and "Political concessions are unreliable". Supporting the "Anti-one china market", "Anti-ecfa" and "Anti-service trade" by the youth army of the sunflower student movement led to the inability to sign the "Cross-strait agreement on trade in services" and the "Cross-strait agreement on trade in goods" was stillborn.
However, since the dpp came to power, it ghost mannequin effect service has repeatedly claimed to respect the basis of the previous 23 agreements, hoping that the continued operation of ecfa will not be affected by the political hostility between the authorities across the taiwan strait. This shows that the importance and effectiveness of ecfa have been affirmed.
In fact, after the cross-strait authorities signed the ecfa, the industry enjoys tariff-free or lower tariffs, and its export competitiveness will not need to be relocated to china or other countries. Enterprises investing in and setting up factories can stay in taiwan, which will also attract investment from multinational companies. . As for taiwan's domestic industries with weak competitiveness and domestic demand-oriented industries, they will negotiate for favorable conditions for taiwan, such as not being included in the early harvest list, and seeking to retain, not open, open for a longer period, or strive for an adjustment period.